Record Management for Psychosis and Schizophrenia - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theRecord Management for Psychosis and Schizophrenia. Answer: Annotation: Administrations concerning the welfare and development of society are increasingly becoming more complex in order to keep up with the constant co-ordination with the public. This essay critically analyzes the research project on the impact of UK FOIA (Shepherd, Stevenson and Flinn 2010). Introduction: The UK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) since January 2005 enforced the record management action in the local governments to benefit the authorities to meet up with their obligations (Johnson 2014). This essay in a way discovers the impactful link between FOI and records management with the prospects of policy managers, requestors and users from communities. Analysis: The research methodology the FOIA on the population counting over 115,000, conquering public sectors, to build a more effect review (Silver 2016). The research built a data-rich report, potentially compared to the other sectors, especially local government authorities as had underlying defaults. Research proved to be beneficial, majority lack in the record management, already exposed to high percentage of failures. Two specific methodologies, the data collection phase 1 focused on interviewing personnel in authority only to detect that it was more in a generalized form than precise records, evidently uploaded to system software to assist analysis of data. While the second phase mainly focusing on the requestors identifying three main categories, data collection was initiated. Understanding the approach of the local authorities is a priority in order to know the past management strategy and hence building up the newer ones. Local government concerns were a part of the conduct, wherein, the methodology in-sighted that it was not a formal procedure to maintain the records as needed (Worthy and Hazell 2013). This was a very important step as it identified that the information was variant from one authority to other. While in other cases, it was not even considered a priority. To worse, is the other results wherein, concerns were listed where there was no designated staff to handle the records. Few authorizations were in command of their records even if discretely but that was manageable. However, in this stage of the research, record management was observed in IT sectors and legal departments, where for former it was part of the technical issues while, for the later was a mere requirement in their subjected procedure more than setting it as priority. While th ere lays another comparison, new job firms had a separate team with concept of information governance. In such cases, there emerged two issues regarding the combinational effect of the FOI and record management team. Evidently it produced definite positive result when both the systems work together, rather, in contrast the second condition there lies a communication gap between these and henceforth, not functioning properly. Critical acclamation stresses on the amalgamation of both teams. Another impactful register of events would be the re-sizing and re-location of record-management offices, developing into smart-working, to increase business efficiency. Withholding to this another sighted issue was the act for data protection which in an obvious way got highlighted with reported cases of data security in relevance to FOI requests (Uskali and Kuutti 2015). This act again proved to be beneficial resulting in the installation of control-measures regarding the same. Regarding the FOI act, launched in 2000 and enforced around 2005, the lord chancellor provided enough duration for the organizations to prepare the individual record reports, as some of them prepared it by 2003 while critically not appreciated, some concerns delayed it and set as a last-minute task (Worthy 2013). The purpose of this act was to enforce a corporate approach towards record management to bear a positive result with suggested collaborations. In this, many collected data analysis insight the support from the senior-level officers hence helping the organizations, develop a sustainable corporate approach. Study on the effectiveness of the act shows that however initially, the subject of deliverables was unclear to many organizations but it proved to be manageable. A comparative analysis clearly can claim, among the volumes of FOI requests, some targeted the statistic for the current data while other information cited the request for the financial information, without any distinctions mentioned. Conclusion: On analysis of the research results, it is concluded that local authorities were able to bear the pressure to produce positive results to FOI department. Delays were not always due to the inefficiency of record management but due to the inability to identify the asked deliverables, as few personnel reported, they doubted their delivery reports. Some attitude adaption by the FOIA would make the task easier and ethical for organizations. Annotation: In accordance with the article on published reviews on the lack of record maintenance in community practicing centers, this essay provides a critical analysis on the series of events and its impact on the society (Beach and Oates 2014). Alongside the enactment of policies are analyzed. Introduction: Case reviews published on 2013 focusing on the inaccurate record management of the healthcare centers is of critical concern. Similar scenario, even in the National Health Service (NHS) foundations especially in that of Staffordshire with an increasing amount of failures recorded in record keeping departments deliberately reporting issues to perform the same. From reviews, it is clear the records are either solely due or in the process with deficiencies. In present world of electronic supports, as compared to our recent past, it is more beneficial in the management. Policy and practice reflect the nature of service provided. Analysis: The two prior aspects of legislation relevant to record management are the data protection Act in 1988 and FOIA- Freedom of Information Act in 2005. These two acts set the legalities to gather, store and protect information related to UK-patients, where, confidentiality is priority. These would provide the remittance to the damage caused due to inefficiency. The record keeping enables the inter-professional communication supporting the workers in the future progress (Beach and Oates 2014). This practice needs proper supervisions; a list of relevant acts from the government ensures the same. Good information governance refers to the maintenance of the records in a proper, ethical way. Second Governance reviews claim the concerns regarding new technologies and the communication, each health organization was appointed with Caldicott personnel- the head with the records. This proved beneficial, as it was a solution to many un-answered issues. In 2013 review, with all the preceding principles an addition was, data security and providence, only when needed (Weaver et al. 2016). Regulate professionals should maintain the confidentiality of the patients as far as possible with the non-regulated professionals while on treatment. Regarding information of patients, their consent should be a priority. Duplication of records should be avoided to maximum. With the growing electronic media to support this act, facilities towards an integrated system is sustainable. As recorded, a childcare program too is online, however with some national level online disputes, approaches towards local versions help to integrate on a level (Kern et al. 2013). In Scotland, decommissioning of the national access to the electronically stored information summary was beneficial to establish a local version with customized supports. Record sharing is a smart way to improve record management as the shared responsibility ensures efficiency for organizations (Kendall et al. 2013). The 2012 act for health and social care, collaborates agencies and organizations to broaden medical records management setting out a view to the structure for the stored information. Success is achieved, when supervisions from the members are witnessed. Greater collaboration and reduced duplicity are involved with electronic support (Miriovsky, Shulman and Abernethy 2012). Conclusion: On analysis, it can be concluded information governance is a prior requirement and that of the practitioner has viability beyond his tenure. Simultaneously, regarding the patient data-security should be maintained based on ethical grounds. Electronic system for data record is a perfect suggestive method to broaden the levels and attain sustainability towards management and quality services based on collaborative efforts. References: Beach, J. and Oates, J., 2014. Maintaining best practice in record-keeping and documentation.Nursing Standard,28(36), pp.45-50. Johnson, D., 2014. EU migrant criminal activity: Exploring spatial diversity and volume of criminal activity attributed to inter EU migrants in England.Applied Geography,50, pp.48-62. Kendall, T., Hollis, C., Stafford, M. and Taylor, C., 2013. Recognition and management of psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance.Bmj,346, p.f150. Kern, L.M., Barrn, Y., Dhopeshwarkar, R.V., Edwards, A., Kaushal, R. and with the HITEC Investigators, 2013. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care.Journal of general internal medicine,28(4), pp.496-503. Miriovsky, B.J., Shulman, L.N. and Abernethy, A.P., 2012. Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care.Journal of Clinical Oncology,30(34), pp.4243-4248. Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A. and Flinn, A., 2010. Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England.Government Information Quarterly,27(4), pp.337-345. Silver, D., 2016. The News Media and the FOIA.Communication Law and Policy,21(4), pp.493-514. Uskali, T.I. and Kuutti, H., 2015. Models and streams of data Journalism.The Journal of Media Innovations,2(1), pp.77-88. Weaver, C.A., Ball, M.J., Kim, G.R. and Kiel, J.M., 2016. Healthcare information management systems.Cham: Springer International Publishing. Worthy, B. and Hazell, R., 2013. The Impact of the Freedom of Information Act in the UK. Worthy, B., 2013. Some are more open than others: Comparing the impact of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on local and central government in the UK.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,15(5), pp.395-414.